Theologian · Medieval
Ibn Taymiyya
1263–1328 · Hanbali law and creed; scripturalist theology against kalam, falsafa and monist Sufism
The Damascene jurist whose “Correct Answer” is the most thorough medieval Muslim refutation of Christianity, written in reply to a Melkite bishop of Sidon, and whose reading of the Qur'an and the early community still shapes the Salafi movement the Church meets today.
A Hanbali scholar of Mamluk Damascus, imprisoned repeatedly and dying in the citadel, Ibn Taymiyya held that the Qur'an, the Sunna and the understanding of the first generations (the salaf) are the whole of religion, and that the later theology (kalam), Greek philosophy and the monism of Ibn Arabi are innovations. In “Averting the Conflict between Reason and Revelation” he argued that sound reason never contradicts the text, and in “Against the Greek Logicians” that universals exist only in the mind and that syllogism yields no certain knowledge of real things. He affirmed God's names and attributes as revealed, “without asking how,” held that God acts in time and creates perpetually, taught that acts are good or evil in themselves though obligation comes by command, defended a middle path on free will between compulsion and self-creation, and in the “Correct Answer” answered Christian claims about the Trinity, the Incarnation and the Scriptures point by point. His fatwas on fighting the Mongols, on visiting tombs and on the public conduct of non-Muslims made him the model of the activist scholar.
Why he matters: Thomas Michel, S.J., translated the “Correct Answer” so that Catholics could read the strongest medieval case against their faith from the Muslim side, and the dialogue documents since Nostra Aetate have had to reckon with the scripturalism he founded. He is also, with Scotus, a near-contemporary witness to the late medieval turn from universals to the singular and from analogy to a common concept of being, reached from the opposite religion.
Where to be careful
His denial that reason can reach demonstrative knowledge of natures stands against Dei Filius on the natural knowledge of God, his rule that error has no public rights and his doctrine of jihad against the confessional state's enemies against Dignitatis Humanae, and his reading of God's attributes as sheer revealed data against the analogy of being taught at Lateran IV; he rejects the Trinity and the Incarnation outright. What remains is a shared insistence that God is one, really distinct from the world and active in it, that acts have a goodness of their own, and that the ruler is bound by God's law.
Reading
-
A Muslim Theologian's Response to Christianity: Ibn Taymiyya's Al-Jawab al-SahihIbn Taymiyya, trans. Thomas F. Michel · The abridged “Correct Answer,” with a Jesuit Islamologist's long introduction; the case against Christianity as a serious Muslim made it.
-
Ibn Taymiyya Against the Greek LogiciansIbn Taymiyya, trans. Wael B. Hallaq · His attack on Aristotelian definition and syllogism, where his nominalism and empiricism are plainest.
-
Ibn Taymiyya's Theological EthicsSophia Vasalou · A careful study of his middle path between divine command and intellectualism, the ground on which a Thomist can meet him.
Documented positions
Where this thinker stands on each dispute the test covers.