All thinkers

Theologian · Medieval

Ibn Taymiyya

1263–1328 · Hanbali law and creed; scripturalist theology against kalam, falsafa and monist Sufism

Outside the Church Muslim (Hanbali; Salafi forerunner)

The Damascene jurist whose “Correct Answer” is the most thorough medieval Muslim refutation of Christianity, written in reply to a Melkite bishop of Sidon, and whose reading of the Qur'an and the early community still shapes the Salafi movement the Church meets today.

A Hanbali scholar of Mamluk Damascus, imprisoned repeatedly and dying in the citadel, Ibn Taymiyya held that the Qur'an, the Sunna and the understanding of the first generations (the salaf) are the whole of religion, and that the later theology (kalam), Greek philosophy and the monism of Ibn Arabi are innovations. In “Averting the Conflict between Reason and Revelation” he argued that sound reason never contradicts the text, and in “Against the Greek Logicians” that universals exist only in the mind and that syllogism yields no certain knowledge of real things. He affirmed God's names and attributes as revealed, “without asking how,” held that God acts in time and creates perpetually, taught that acts are good or evil in themselves though obligation comes by command, defended a middle path on free will between compulsion and self-creation, and in the “Correct Answer” answered Christian claims about the Trinity, the Incarnation and the Scriptures point by point. His fatwas on fighting the Mongols, on visiting tombs and on the public conduct of non-Muslims made him the model of the activist scholar.

Why he matters: Thomas Michel, S.J., translated the “Correct Answer” so that Catholics could read the strongest medieval case against their faith from the Muslim side, and the dialogue documents since Nostra Aetate have had to reckon with the scripturalism he founded. He is also, with Scotus, a near-contemporary witness to the late medieval turn from universals to the singular and from analogy to a common concept of being, reached from the opposite religion.

Where to be careful

His denial that reason can reach demonstrative knowledge of natures stands against Dei Filius on the natural knowledge of God, his rule that error has no public rights and his doctrine of jihad against the confessional state's enemies against Dignitatis Humanae, and his reading of God's attributes as sheer revealed data against the analogy of being taught at Lateran IV; he rejects the Trinity and the Incarnation outright. What remains is a shared insistence that God is one, really distinct from the world and active in it, that acts have a goodness of their own, and that the ruler is bound by God's law.

Reading

  • A Muslim Theologian's Response to Christianity: Ibn Taymiyya's Al-Jawab al-Sahih
    Ibn Taymiyya, trans. Thomas F. Michel · The abridged “Correct Answer,” with a Jesuit Islamologist's long introduction; the case against Christianity as a serious Muslim made it.
  • Ibn Taymiyya Against the Greek Logicians
    Ibn Taymiyya, trans. Wael B. Hallaq · His attack on Aristotelian definition and syllogism, where his nominalism and empiricism are plainest.
  • Ibn Taymiyya's Theological Ethics
    Sophia Vasalou · A careful study of his middle path between divine command and intellectualism, the ground on which a Thomist can meet him.

Documented positions

Where this thinker stands on each dispute the test covers.

Settled teaching Its center Open question Beyond teaching, not condemned Condemned error
I

God and Being · What is, and whence it is.

Can reason know that God exists? Natural theology
Fideism or agnosticism Natural theology
How is God related to the world? Creation from nothing
Pantheism or emanation Creation from nothing
Is the world governed by purpose? Providence and final causes
Chance and mechanism Providence and final causes
Do natures and essences really exist? Nominalism
Nominalism Realism
God's essence and His energies Essence–energies distinction
Essence–energies distinction Absolute simplicity
How should we speak of God? Cataphatic (analogical) way
Apophatic (negative) way Cataphatic (analogical) way
Is 'being' said of God and of creatures in the same sense? Univocity of being
Analogy of being Univocity of being
II

Faith, Reason and Truth · How we know, and whom we trust.

Faith and reason: who has the last word? Fideism
Rationalism Fideism
Where does knowledge begin? Between
Senses and abstraction Illumination and innate ideas
Is truth objective? Objective truth
Relativism and pragmatism Objective truth
Who interprets revelation? Private judgment
Private judgment Living Tradition and Magisterium
How should Scripture be read? Fundamentalist literalism
Critical reductionism Fundamentalist literalism
Are the world's learning and arts a danger or a gift? A danger: Athens has nothing to do with Jerusalem
A danger: Athens has nothing to do with Jerusalem A gift to be baptized
III

The Human Person · Soul, body, freedom and the Fall.

Is there a spiritual soul? Immortal spiritual soul
Mind is brain Immortal spiritual soul
Is the body really you? Between
Dualism Body–soul unity
Are you free? Determinism
Determinism Free will
How fallen is human nature? Basically good
Totally depraved Basically good
The body and its desires Contempt for the flesh
Contempt for the flesh Desire as its own law
Person and community Collectivism
Individualism Collectivism
Marriage, sex and the body's meaning Given by nature and grace
Given by nature and grace Defined by consent and identity
What is suffering for? A share in the Cross
An evil to be relieved A share in the Cross
IV

The Moral Life · Law, virtue, conscience and the good.

Is morality objective and knowable? Natural law
Relativism Natural law
Why is the good good? Between
Divine command (voluntarism) Eternal law (intellectualism)
Are some acts always wrong? Intrinsically evil acts
Consequentialism Intrinsically evil acts
Rules or character? Morality of obligation
Morality of obligation Morality of virtue and beatitude
What is conscience? Conscience bound to truth
Autonomous conscience Conscience bound to truth
What is happiness? Beatitude in God
Earthly flourishing Beatitude in God
V

Grace and Salvation · How God saves, and whom.

How does grace move the will? Thomist (Bañezian)
Thomist (Bañezian) Molinist
Who can be saved? Strict exclusivism
Strict exclusivism Indifferentism
What is salvation for? Pardon and escape
Pardon and escape Deification
Hell and hope All will be saved
The many are lost All will be saved
Where does your eye rest in Christ: His divinity or His humanity? The man Jesus of Nazareth
The eternal Word made flesh The man Jesus of Nazareth
VI

Church and Society · Authority, the state, wealth and the nation.

Church and state Social kingship of Christ
Laicism Social kingship of Christ
The economic order Laissez-faire capitalism
Socialism Laissez-faire capitalism
Where does authority come from? Authority from God
Social contract Authority from God
Reform or tradition? Guided by tradition
Remake by reason Guided by tradition
The nation and the Church Nation does not matter
Nation or race first Nation does not matter
May the state restrain false religion? The confessional state: error has no rights
The confessional state: error has no rights Civil liberty for every religion
May a Christian take up the sword? Yes: war can be just and sometimes a duty
Never: the way of the Cross is nonviolence Yes: war can be just and sometimes a duty
VII

Worship, Prayer and the Two Lungs · Liturgy, icons, the Spirit, and the See of Peter.

Icons and images Iconoclasm
Iconoclasm Veneration of images
The way of prayer Discursive meditation
Stillness and the Jesus Prayer Discursive meditation
Contemplation or action? Action: the apostolate and the works of mercy
Action: the apostolate and the works of mercy Contemplation: the one thing needful

A profile of your philosophical and theological leanings, measured against the settled teaching of the Catholic Church, East and West. It is a tool for examination and reading, not an instrument of judgment.

Ad maiorem Dei gloriam.